에너지경제연구원 전자도서관

로그인

에너지경제연구원 전자도서관

자료검색

  1. 메인
  2. 자료검색
  3. 통합검색

통합검색

단행본

Renewable Energy Transformation or Fossil Fuel Backlash: vested interests in the political economy

발행사항
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York, NY : Palgrave MacMillan, 2015
형태사항
xviii, 291p. ; 23cm
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (pages 248-275) and index
소장정보
위치등록번호청구기호 / 출력상태반납예정일
지금 이용 불가 (1)
자료실E207162대출중2024.06.13
지금 이용 불가 (1)
  • 등록번호
    E207162
    상태/반납예정일
    대출중
    2024.06.13
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    자료실
책 소개
Why is renewable energy pursued so much more enthusiastically by some countries than others? The answer could simply be that countries with unresolved energy problems and an abundance of renewable resources pursue more ambitious policies. The author, however, argues that this is not so. Rather, renewable energy represents a potential future energy transformation and a major challenge to the existing energy system. It rises in the face of some of the most powerful energy actors the world has seen ? fossil fuels, nuclear and electric utility companies ? all of which have a vested interest in preserving the system. Moe analyzes the political economy of renewable energy in six very different countries (Japan, China, Germany, USA, Denmark and Norway) and energy structures, claiming that it is the extent to which states have successfully controlled these vested interests and prevented them from unduly influencing energy institutions that determines whether or not renewable energy has been a success.

목차
1 Introduction 2 Japan: No Structural Change, Save for a Structural Shock? Vested Interests Pre- and Post-Fukushima 3 China: No Energy Transformation, but Full Speed Ahead. Or ...? 4 The US: Renewable Energy Doing (Reasonably) Well. Despite the State or Because of It? 5 Germany: At a Crossroads, or Social and Political Consensus Setting It on a Course for Structural Change? 6 Denmark: An Energy Transformation in the Making? Wind Power on the Inside of the System 7 Norway: A Petro-Industrial Complex Leaving Little Room for Structural Change? 8 Conclusions Notes References Index